From: (val bykovsky) Sender: (Yaneer Bar-Yam) To: complex-science Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 01:32:40 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from QMTA05.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.48] verified) by necsi.org (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0.6) with ESMTP id 22532900 for complex-science@necsi.org; Thu, 07 Aug 2008 23:03:07 -0400 Received: from OMTA11.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.36]) by QMTA05.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id zVKP1Z00S0mv7h055f2MoB; Fri, 08 Aug 2008 03:02:21 +0000 Received: from [192.168.0.102] ([24.218.180.115]) by OMTA11.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id zf371Z0012VnB9C3Xf37t9; Fri, 08 Aug 2008 03:03:07 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=hEi1sDRfBrcA:10 a=jPPmQXA7adsA:10 a=6iGDsG3gGkDRH6ISlTQA:9 a=04Jtaf1flWHsk5g3LosA:7 a=zmh4pl-Lq-piyO6UYTiUi2CSL5gA:4 a=gx5bkW9XiUAA:10 X-Original-Message-ID: <489BB768.7070004@vtek.com> X-Original-Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 23:03:04 -0400 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-To: complex-science@necsi.org Subject: Re: Watson-Crick and Prigoginian forms of genetic information References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sung, It is always a pleasure to read your very logical comments. Let's try to place your logic in a "wider" context though. (Sungchul Ji) wrote: > There is no doubt that cells are capable of transmitting information in > space (e.g.,from the nucleus to the cytosol and to the adjacent cells) and > in time (e.g., from one cell generation to the next in developing > organisms or from one population of organisms to next in evolution). > > The molecular mechanisms underlying the information transmission in time > (i.e., through transfer of DNA sequences) has been well established > throughout the latter half of the 20th century following the discoveries > of the double helical structure of DNA by Watson and Crick in 1953 and > the genetic code in the 1960's. But the mechanisms responsible for the > information transmission through space has not been widely discussed in the > biological literature, despite the fact that the relevant experiments have > been vigorously persued, for example, in the fields of cell-cell > communications and signal transduction pathways in individual cells. > Consequently, the contemporary concept of genetic information (i.e., > genes) has been, it seems to me, unjustifiably biased in favor of the time > dimension at the sacrifice of the spatial dimension. The main purpose of > this post is to contribute to righting this bias, with the hope of > defining genes in a more realistic manner for the post-ENCODE > (Encyclopedia of DNA elements) genomics. It seems to me that even within that *highly simplistic* model there were both temporal *and* spatial components; indeed, the gene-controlled synthesis of proteins is the *sequence* of events in time *and* in space - as any synthesis of mol. structures in chemistry. So, to me, the "information transmission" in chemistry is always a process in space and in time. > > In 1988 [1] I proposed that there are two types of genetic information in > the cell -- the traditional sequence-centered information (referred to as > the Watson-Crick form) and the new, dynamic information encoded in > concentration waves such as ion gradients and time-dependent RNA levels in > the cell (referred to as the Prigoginian form). The Prigoginian form of > genetic information (or Prigoginian genes, for short) can be identified > with "intracellular dissipative structures" (IDSs), the final form of > gene expression according to the Bhopalator model of the cell [2]. In [1] > I have proposed the following ideas: > > 1) Watson-Crick genes => information transmission in time > 2) Prigoginian genes => information transmission in space, > > where "=>" means "is responsible for" or "can mediate". > > Examples of information transmission in space and time are familiar to us > through music and languages:. > > 1) Information transmission in time = Sheet music; written languages > 2) Information transmission in space = Audio music; spoken languages > > We can summarize all these ideas in a tabular form: > > Table 1. The duality of the mechanisms of information transmission > in linguistics, musicology, and cell biology. > _____________________________________________________________________ > > Information Transmission in > ____________________________________________________ > > Information Space Time > Carriers > (or Signs) > ______________________________________________________________________ > > Macroscopic Audio music Sheet music > Spoken language Written language > > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > > Microscopic Dissipative structures Equilibrium structures > (e.g., concentration waves) (e.g., DNA segments) > > (Prigoginian genes) (Watson-Crick genes) > _______________________________________________________________________ > > It is interesting to note that the information transmission in space > utilizes waves of sounds or concentrations, whereas the information in > space utilizes discrete material objects of either microscopic (e.g., DNA > sequences) or macroscopic (e.g., words, musical notes) dimensions. Thus, > it appears that the duality of spatial and temporal mechanisms of > information transfer ultimately depends on the duality of waves and > particles. Since DNA is a quantum mechanical object, it is not surprising > that it should exhibit both particle and wave properties. > > Does anybody on this list know if a similar relation between the > space-time duality and the wave-particle duality is observed in physics? Well, in (quantum) physics, a process, for example, a photo-induced chemical reaction of dissociation (or association) is always a spatio-temporal *and* wave-particle (quantum) phenomenon, say, the dissociation of polar molecules by slow electrons (AB+e-->A+B-). As to your introduction of process(P) genes, in addition to structural(S) ones, well, a gene seems to be an inseparable structure *and* function - in terms of chemistry and biology. So, a gene cannot be purely S-gene as well as it cannot be purely P-gene. Correct me if im missing something here. Sung, your analogy with sheet music is indeed nice and instructive, demonstrating implicitly the critical/creative role of the *interpretive environment*, the musician/performer. To me, in a cell, the DNA/genome is a "dead stuff", a hi-tech punch-card, being (continuously) *interpreted* by the cellular environment in terms of the spatio-temporal tune ("protein expression") which is life. [feel free to correct this speculation] spatio-temporal-ly y'rs, val > > With all the best. > > Sung > > > Reference: > > [1] Ji, S. (1988). Watson-Crick and Prigoginian forms of Genetic > Information. J. > theoretical Biology 130:239-245. > [2] Ji, S. (1985). The Bhopalator--a molecular model of the living cell > based on > the concepts of conformons and dissipative structures. J. theoret. Biol. > 116:399-426.