From: (Thanasis Argiriou) Sender: (Yaneer Bar-Yam) To: complex-science Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 23:27:43 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com ([209.85.200.169] verified) by necsi.org (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0.6) with ESMTP id 22459667 for complex-science@necsi.org; Sun, 03 Aug 2008 04:34:09 -0400 Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 25so1578023wfc.14 for ; Sun, 03 Aug 2008 01:34:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=lNfLgkYrdODYLWrrbvWJ13jD0/RzL8G5s+pbZa7opZE=; b=mmb4m2pDSftr/GLZSakQQQsLGxd31qHawGFaKD6NCH8w9eCq+0Bcu1qox/cgsX7yx3 W51q85ZtUS9fI+JHVi/hab+I02VcWhXlw8Os5oWxKbKSTD9YXHDHkPCpY0o3QRdf7gs6 icNbhv9ILi2v48Go0vSHeaMh1ZYmxlQ39tGvk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=mie4StRe1TCKfXCQWsrElNBpNprw7ySOekL4Z1Af9Ze6c8QxP4uNhRNXFpehSthPtZ z+VkMJoArCTu47OyUYVrjuR/r0fMBgiwyMC+KZ2sAwNqxPSQ9aDGwIXinJwFW/f5zVwh MaQbig21oOJa3xzEJW2YXkI1EI1LoRH279W+U= Received: by 10.142.162.9 with SMTP id k9mr4466863wfe.93.1217752447818; Sun, 03 Aug 2008 01:34:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.203.4 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Aug 2008 01:34:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-Message-ID: <79285ab50808030134l6f50e5a1kf7990c467ba0937e@mail.gmail.com> X-Original-Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2008 11:34:07 +0300 X-Original-To: complex-science@necsi.org Subject: compexity of words and language MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_10030_32850756.1217752447776" ------=_Part_10030_32850756.1217752447776 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline In other matters for some reason I continue to search for etymology, though I do not know if my etymology dictum dictionary is unbiased, so all the res= t that follows goes to nothingness *matter* [image: Look u= p matter at Dictionary.com] c.1300, "material of thought, speech, or expression," from Anglo-Norm. *matere,*fro= m L. *materia* "substance from which something is made," also "hard inner wood o= f a tree" (cf. Port. *madeira* "wood"), perhaps from *mater* "origin, source, mother." Or, on another theory, it represents **dmateria,* from PIE root * *dem-/*dom-* (cf. L. *domus* "house," Eng. *timber*). With sense developmen= t influenced by Gk. *hyle,* of which it was the equivalent in philosophy. Meaning "substance of which physical objects are made" is attested from c.1340. That of "grounds, reason, or cause for something" also is first recorded 1340. So matter became matter in the 1340? and the atom? 1477, as a hypothetical body, the building block of the universe, from L. * atomus* (especially in Lucretius), from Gk. *atomos* "uncut," from *a-*"not= " + *tomos* "a cutting," from *temnein* "to cut." An ancient term of philosophical speculation (in Leucippus, Democritus), revived 1805 by British chemist Dalton. *Atomic* is from 1678 as a philosophical term; scientific sense dates from 1811. *Atomic energy* first recorded 1906; *ato= mic bomb* first recorded 1914 in writings of H.G. Wells, who thought of it as a bomb "that would continue to explode indefinitely." *Atom bomb* is from 1945; *Atomic Age* is from 1945. Funny how whole disciplines of science became simple references in language and reality of the nucleus? General sense of "central part or thing, about which others cluster" is fro= m 1762. Use in reference to cells first recorded 1831. Modern atomic meaning is 1912, first by Ernest Rutherford, though theoretical use for "central point of an atom" is from 1844, in Faraday. reality? *reality* [image: Look= up reality at Dictionary.com] 1550, originally a legal term in the sense of "fixed property," from M.L. * realitatem* (nom. *realitas*), from L.L. *realis*; meaning "real existence" is from 1647 reason? *reason (n.)* [image: L= ook up reason at Dictionary.com] ...Meaning "sanity" is recorded from, c.1380. The verb (c.1300) is from O.Fr. * raisoner,* from L.L. *rationare* "to discourse." *discourse* [image: Look up discourse at Dictionary.com] c.1374, alteration of L. *discursus* "a running about," in L.L. "conversation," fro= m stem of *discurrere* "run about," from *dis-* "apart" + *currere* "to run." Sense of "formal speech or writing" is first recorded 1581 *bias* [image: Look up bi= as at Dictionary.com] 1530, from M.Fr. *biasis* "slant, oblique," from O.Prov. *biais,* possibly from V.L. **(e)bigassius,* from Gk. *epikarsios* "slanting, oblique," from *epi-*"upon" + *karsios* "oblique." Transferred sense of "predisposition, prejudice" is from 1572. *unbiased* [image: Look up unbiased at Dictionary.com] 1607, lit., in ref to throws at bowls, from *un-*(1) "not" + pp. of *bias* . Fig. sense of "impartial, unprejudiced" is recorded from 1647 Still I am not that, more or less than the etymology dict? Still? *still (adj.)* [image: L= ook up still at Dictionary.com] O.E. *stille* "motionless, stationary," from W.Gmc. **steljaz* (cf. O.Fris., M.L.G., M.Du. *stille*, Du. *stil*, O.H.G. *stilli*, Ger. *still*), from root **stel-* "fixed, not moving, standing" (see *stall*(1)). Meaning "quiet, silent" emerged in later O.E.; noun meaning "quietness, the silent part" first attested 1608, in *still of the night*. The adverbial sense of "even now, even then, yet" (*still standing there*) is first recorded 1535. *I* [image: Look up I at Dictionary.com] 12c. shorten= ing of O.E. *ic,* first person sing. nom. pronoun, from P.Gmc. **ekan* (cf. O.Fris. *ik,* O.N. *ek,* Norw. *eg,* Dan. *jeg,* O.H.G. *ih,* Ger. *ich,*Go= th. *ik*), from PIE **ego(m)* (cf. Skt. *aham,* Hitt. *uk,* L. *ego,* Gk. *ego,*Rus. *ja*). Reduced to *i* by 1137 in northern England, it began to be capitalized c.1250 to mark it as a distinct word and avoid misreading in handwritten manuscripts. capital I? could it have a greater significance? not? *not* [image: Look up not = at Dictionary.com] negative particle, c.1250, unstressed variant of *noht, naht* "in no way" (see * naught* ). *naught* [image: Look u= p naught at Dictionary.com] O.E. *nawiht* "nothing," lit "no whit," from *na* "no" (from PIE base **ne-* "no= , not;" see *un* - (1)) + *wiht*"thing, creature, being" (see *wight* ). *wight* [image: Look up wight at Dictionary.com] = O.E. *wiht* "living being, creature," from P.Gmc. **wekhtiz* (cf. O.S. *wiht*"thing, demon," Du. *wicht* "a little child," O.H.G. *wiht* "thing, creature, demon," Ger. * Wicht* "creature, infant," O.N. *vettr* "thing, creature," Swed. *v=E4tte*"spirit of the earth, gnome," Goth. *waihts* "something"). The only apparent cognate outside Gmc. is O.C.S. * ve=9Ati* "a thing." Not related to the *Isle of Wight*, which is from L. * Vectis* (c.150), originally Celtic, possibly meaning "place of the division." why division? *divide (v.)* [image: L= ook up divide at Dictionary.com] c.1374, from L. *dividere* "to force apart, cleave, distribute," from *dis-* "apart= " + *-videre* "to separate," from PIE base **widh-* "to separate," dis? *dis-* [image: Look up di= s- at Dictionary.com] prefix meaning 1. "lack of, not" (e.g. *dishonest*); 2. "do the opposite of" (e.g. *disallow*); 3. "apart, away" (e.g. *discard*), from O.Fr. *des-,* from L. *dis-* "apart," from PIE **dis-* "apart, asunder= " (cf. O.E. *te-*, O.S. *ti-*, O.H.G. *ze-*, Ger. *zer-*). The PIE root is a secondary form of **dwis-* and is thus related to L. *bis* "twice" (originally **dvis*) and to *duo. * ** *is it similar to * ** *de-?* ** *decide?* ** *decide* [image: Look u= p decide at Dictionary.com] c.1380, from O.Fr. *decider,* from L. *decidere* "to decide," lit. "to cut off," from *de-* "off" + *c=E6dere* "to cut" (see *cement*). Sense is of resolving difficulties "at a stroke." Originally "to settle a dispute;" meaning "to make up one's mind" is attested from 1830. but if you just cut off, how do we settle a dispute? ** Next question is why both the one dis- which means two and the other whose one meaning is? negation de- have negative meanings? is it so in which cases and if my first supposition stands is why? ** ** Knowledge from the past and the transition of religions? The daimons became demons, with the Christian reign, Science? and after that came logos to illuminate the heathens bringing the logic attested of the Greeks? and science Which Greeks?, meaning of what form? the ones beleiving to the myths and gods? the desdemones which in recent century onomatology means superstitious, and in ancient language , or the early scientists? that had not the ability to create the tech of today whic= h is the triumph of scientific validate and reality, science is reality since it creates. heathen? *heathen* [image: Look= up heathen at Dictionary.com] O.E. *h=E6=F0en* "not Christian or Jewish," merged with O.N. *hei=F0inn.* Histor= ically assumed to be from Goth. *hai=FEno* "gentile, heathen woman," used by Ulfil= as in the first translation of the Bible into a Gmc. language (cf. Mark 7:26, for "Greek"); if so it could be a derivative of Goth. *hai=FEi* "dwelling o= n the heath," but this sense is not recorded. It may have been chosen on mode= l of L. *paganus* (see *pagan*), or for resemblance to Gk. *ethne* (see *gentile*), or may in fact be a borrowing of that word, perhaps via Armenian *hethanos.*Like other words for exclusively Christian ideas (e.g. *church*) it would have come first into Gothic, then spread to other Gmc. languages. desidemonas? *superstitious* [image: Look up superstitious at Dictionary.com] c.1386, from O.Fr. *superstitieux*, from L. *superstitiosus*, from *superstitionem*(nom. *superstitio*) "prophecy, soothsaying, excessive fear of the gods," perhaps originally "state of religious exaltation," related to *superstes* (gen. * superstitis*) "standing over or above," also "standing by, surviving," from *superstare* "stand on or over, survive," from *super* "above" (see *super-*) + *stare* "to stand," from PIE base **sta-* "to stand" (see *stet*). There are many theories for the L. sense development, but none has yet triumphed. *Superstition* is attested from 1402. In Eng., originally especially of religion; sense of "unreasonable notion" is from 1794. science? *science* [image: Look= up science at Dictionary.com] c.1300, "knowledge (of something) acquired by study," also "a particular branch of knowledge," from O.Fr. *science,* from L. *scientia* "knowledge," from * sciens* (gen. *scientis*), prp. of *scire* "to know," probably originally "to separate one thing from another, to distinguish," related to *scindere*"to cut, divide," from PIE base **skei-* (cf. Gk. *skhizein* "to split, rend, cleave," Goth. *skaidan,* O.E= . *sceadan* "to divide, separate;" see *shed*(v.)). Modern sense of "non-arts studies" is attested from 1678. The distinction is commonly understood as between theoretical truth (Gk. * episteme*) and methods for effecting practical results (*tekhne*), but * science* sometimes is used for practical applications and *art* for applications of skill. Main modern (restricted) sense of "body of regular o= r methodical observations or propositions ... *concerning any subject or speculation" is attested from 1725; in 17c.-18c. this concept commonly was called philosophy.* To *blind (someone) with science* "confuse by the use o= f big words or complex explanations" is attested from 1937, originally noted as a phrase from Australia and New Zealand. *physics* [image: Look up physics at Dictionary.com] 1589, "natural science," from *physic* (q.v.) in sense of "natural science." Specific sense of "science treating of properties of matter and energy" is from 1715. *Physicist* coined 1840 by Eng. philosopher William Whewell (1794-1866) to denote a "cultivator of physics" as opposed to a *physician.= * *pseudo-science* [image: Look up pseudo-science at Dictionary.com] "a pretended or mistaken science," 1844, from *pseudo-* (q.v.) + *science.* * physiology* [image: Look up physiology at Dictionary.com] 1564, "study and description of natural objects," from L. *physiologia* "natural science, study of nature," from Gk. *physiologia* "natural science," from * physio-,* comb. form of *physis* "nature" (see *physic*) + *logia* "study." Meaning "science of the normal function of living things= " is attested from 1615. *physic* [image: Look up physic at Dictionary.com] 1297, "art of healing, medical science," also "natural science" (c.1300), from O.Fr. *fisike* "natural science, art of healing" (12c.), from L. *physica*(fem. sing.) "study of nature," from Gk. *physike episteme* "knowledge of nature," from fem. of *physikos*"pertaining to nature," from *physis* "nature," from *phyein* "to bring forth, produce, make to grow" (cf. *phyton* "growth, plant," *phyle* "tribe, race," *phyma* "a growth, tumor") from PIE base **bheu-* "to be exist, grow" (cf. O.E. *beon* "to be,= " see *be* ). Especially in Gk= . *ta physika,* lit. "the natural things," name of Aristotle's treatise on nature= . The verb meaning "to dose with medicine" is attested from 1377. As Pauli had once stated "Division and reduction of symmetry, this then is the kernel of the brute! The former is the ancient attribute of the devil" so is science an improvement? in the gnosis, or istamai stasis or something else? astronomy or astrology? *astronomy* [image: Look up astronomy at Dictionary.com] 1205, from O.Fr. *astronomie,* from L. *astronomia,* from Gk. *astronomia,* from = * astron* "star" (from PIE base **ster-* "star") + *nomos* "arranging, regulating," related to *nemein* "to deal out" (see *numismatics*). Used earlier than *astrology*and originally including it. *Astronomical* is 1556 as "concerning astronomy;" as "concerning very large figures" it dates from 1899. *Astrophysics* first recorded 1869. *astrology* [image: Look up astrology at Dictionary.com] c.1375, from L. *astrologia* "astronomy," from Gk. *astrologia* "telling of the stars," from *astron* "star" + *-logia* "treating of," comb. form of *logon*"one who speaks (in a certain manner)." Originally identical with *astronomy,* it had also a special sense of "practical astronomy, astronomy applied to prediction of events." This was divided into *natural astrology*"the calculation and foretelling of natural phenomenon" (tides, eclipses, etc.), and *judicial astrology* "the art of judging occult influences of stars on human affairs" (also known as *stromancy,* 1652). Differentiation began late 1400s and by 17c. this word was limited to "reading influences o= f the stars and their effects on human destiny." chemistry or alchemy? *chemistry* [image: Look up chemistry at Dictionary.com] 1605 (see *chemical* ), originally "alchemy;" the meaning "natural physical process" is 1646, and the scientific study not so called until 1788. The figurative sense of "instinctual attraction or affinity" is older, c.1600, from the alchemical sense. *alchemy* [imag= e: Look up alchemy at Dictionary.com] 1362, from O.Fr. *alkemie,* from M.L. *alkimia,* from Arabic *al-kimiya,* from Gk= . *khemeioa* (found c.300 C.E. in a decree of Diocletian against "the old writings of the Egyptians"), all meaning "alchemy." Perhaps from an old nam= e for Egypt (*Khemia,* lit. "land of black earth," found in Plutarch), or fro= m Gk. *khymatos* "that which is poured out," from *khein* "to pour," related to *khymos* "juice, sap." The word seems to have elements of both origins. "Mahn ... concludes, after an elaborate investigation, that Gr. *khymeia*was probably the original, being first applied to pharmaceutical chemistry, which was chiefly concerned with juices or infusions of plants; that the pursuits of the Alexandrian alchemists were a subsequent development of chemical study, and that the notoriety of these may have caused the name of the art to be popularly associated with the ancient name of Egypt." [OED] The *al-* is the Arabic definite article, "the." The art and the name adopted by the Arabs from Alexandrians and thence returned to Europe via Spain. Alchemy was the "chemistry" of the Middle Ages and early modern times, since c.1600 applied distinctively to the pursuit of the transmutation of baser metals into gold, which, along with the search for the universal solvent and the panacea, were the chief occupations of early chemistry. As they say or see nowdays with words... Greeks had no devils, so I guess one should start understanding what his language means before it is forgotten completly? why *why* [image: Look up why = at Dictionary.com] O.E. *hwi,*instrumental case (showing for what purpose or by what means) of *hw=E6t* (see *what* ), fr= om P.Gmc. **khwi* (cf. O.S. *hwi*, O.N. *hvi*), from PIE **qwei,* locative of = * *qwo-* "who" (cf. Gk. *pei* "where"). As an interjection of surprise or to call attention to a statement, recorded from 1519. Today I was gathering some work to send it regarding synchronous events, an= d at the same time a song played which I found of my liking,then another and other, if everything binds so do the songs and the meanings to the ones wh= o hear them, they are represanttions of ourselves and what we are? *That from the external reality we create the reality that is a coherence o= f our condition to the outside, that this outside is not known, but it forms according to our conditions* As they say the synchronous manifests in chain of events that link without cause or effect?, could there be cause and effect? or are events more like syncronous and because we can not perceive them create the language? or how we perceive? i= s the language part of that? Or ? either? other? I will paste only song one part of the synchronous? the post is long enought, F.E.A.R Lyrics For each a road For everyman a religion Find everybody and rue F*** everything and rumble Forget everything and remember For everything a reason Forgive everybody and remember For each a road For everyman a religion Face everybody and rue F*** everything and rumble Forget everything and remember For everything a reason F.E.A.R Finding eternity arouses reactions Freeing excellence affects reality Fallen empires are ruling Find earth and reap Fantastic expectations Amazing revelations Final execution and resurrection Free expression as revolution Finding everything and realizing You got the fear F.E.A.R. (You got the fear) (Fantastic expectations Amazing revelations Finding everyone and reuniting For everything a reason) F.E.A.R. (You got the fear) You got the fear But the lyrics seem more than I ching than lyrics, i ching is of course or on course nonsense? *fear (n.)* [image: Look = up fear at Dictionary.com] O= .E. *f=E6r* "danger, peril," from P.Gmc. **f=E6ra* (cf. O.S. *far* "ambush," O.= N. * far* "harm, distress, deception," Ger. *Gefahr* "danger"), from PIE base * *per-* "to try, risk, come over, go through" (perhaps connected with Gk. * peira* "trial, attempt, experience," L. *periculum* "trial, risk, danger"). Sense of "uneasiness caused by possible danger" developed c.1175. Filika, Thanasis Ps : Not to be minterpreted, I have only hints and not knowledge, I give only a view, and not a belief, though at some times it looks like and becomes at some point, the following days it evaporates, difficult to be clear, it takes years, of the juman an dis every day with effort. knowledge where? form morphy, scheme *scheme (n.)* [image: L= ook up scheme at Dictionary.com] 1553, "figure of speech," from M.L. *schema* "shape, figure, form, figure of speech," from Gk. *skhema* (gen. *skhematos*) "figure, appearance, the nature of a thing," related to *skhein* "to get," and *ekhein* "to have," from PIE base **segh-* "to hold, to hold in one's power, to have" (cf. Skt. *sahate* "he masters," *sahah* "power, victory;" Avestan *hazah* "power, victory;" Gk. *ekhein* "to have, hold;" Goth. *sigis,* O.H.G. *sigu,* O.N. = * sigr,* O.E. *sige* "victory"). see?>=3D seem?>=3D scheme?>=3D seam? why scheme? from PIE base **segh-* "to hold, to hold in one's power, to have" (cf. Skt. *sahate* "he masters," *sahah* "power, victory;" Avestan * hazah* "power, victory;" why? this relation? *relation* [image: Lo= ok up relation at Dictionary.com] 1390, from Anglo-Fr. *relacioun,* O.Fr. *relacion* (14c.), from L. *relationem*(n= om. *relatio*) "a bringing back, restoring," from *relatus* (see *relate*). Meaning "person related by blood or marriage" first attested 1502. * Relationship* "sense of being related" is from 1744; meaning "an affair, a romantic or sexual relationship" is attested from 1944. And the truth? verify? very? Should we think of the mythis or the stars or the epistime or the language= , one of each, some of each, all or none? Peira or speira? ------=_Part_10030_32850756.1217752447776 Content-Type: text/html; charset=WINDOWS-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline
In other matters for some reason I continue to search for = etymology, though I do not know if my etymology dictum dictionary is unbias= ed, so all the rest that follows goes to nothingness
 
 
matter 3D"Look=20
c.1300, "material of thought, speech, or ex= pression," from Anglo-Norm. matere, from L. materia "s= ubstance from which something is made," also "hard inner wood of = a tree" (cf. Port. madeira = "wood"), perhaps from mater "origin, source, mother." Or, on another theory, it represe= nts *dmateria, from PIE root *dem-/*dom- (cf. L. domus "house," Eng. timber). With sense development influenced by Gk.= hyle, of which it was the equiv= alent in philosophy. Meaning "substance of which physical objects are = made" is attested from c.1340. That of "grounds, reason, or cause= for something" also is first recorded 1340.

 

So matter became matter in the 1340? and the atom= ?

 

1477, as a hypothetical body, the building block = of the universe, from L. atomus = (especially in Lucretius), from Gk. atomos "uncut," from a- "not" + tomos &q= uot;a cutting," from temnein "to cut." An ancient term of philosophical speculation (in Leuc= ippus, Democritus), revived 1805 by British chemist Dalton. Atomic is from 1678 as a philosophical term; sc= ientific sense dates from 1811. Atomic energ= y first recorded 1906; atomic bo= mb first recorded 1914 in writings of H.G. Wells, who thought o= f it as a bomb "that would continue to explode indefinitely." Atom bomb is from 1945; Atomic Age is from 1945.

 

Funny how whole disciplines of science became sim= ple references in language

and

 

reality of the nucleus?

 

General sense of "central part or thing, abo= ut which others cluster" is from 1762. Use in reference to cells first= recorded 1831. Modern atomic meaning is 1912, first by Ernest Rutherford, = though theoretical use for "central point of an atom" is from 184= 4, in Faraday.

 

reality?

 

reality 3D"Look=20
1550, originally a legal term in the sense of &q= uot;fixed property," from M.L. realitat= em (nom. realitas), = from L.L. realis; meaning "= real existence" is from 1647

 

reason?

 

reason (n.)= 3D"Look=20
...Meaning "sanity" is recorded from, = c.1380. The verb (c.1300) is from O.Fr. rais= oner, from L.L. rationare "to discourse."
 
discours= e 3D"Look=20
c.1374, alteration of L. discursus "a running about," in L.L. "co= nversation," from stem of discurrere "run about," from dis- "apart" + currere<= /span> "to run." Sense of "formal speech or writing" is= first recorded 1581 

 

bias 3D"Loo==20
1530, from M.Fr. = biasis "slant, oblique," from O.Prov. biais, possibly from V.L. *(e)bigassius, from Gk. epikarsios "slanting, oblique," from epi- "upon" + karsios "oblique." Transferred sense of &quo= t;predisposition, prejudice" is from 1572.=20
unbiased = 3D"Look==20
1607, lit., in ref to throws at bowls, from un- (1) &qu= ot;not" + pp. of bias. Fig. sense of "impartial,= unprejudiced" is recorded from 1647
 
Still I am not that, more or less than the etymology dict?
&nb= sp;
 
Still?
still (adj.)= 3D"Look=20
O.E. stille<= /span> "motionless, stationary," from W.Gmc. *steljaz (cf. O.Fris., M.L.G., M.Du. stille, Du. stil= , O.H.G. stilli, Ger= . still), from root *stel- "fixed, not moving, standing&qu= ot; (see stall (1)). Meaning "quiet, silent" em= erged in later O.E.; noun meaning "quietness, the silent part" fi= rst attested 1608, in still of the night. The adverbial sense of "even now, even then, yet" (still standing there) is first recor= ded 1535.
 
I 3D"Look=20
12c. shortening of O.E. ic, first person sing. nom. pronoun, from P.Gmc. *ekan (cf. O.Fris. ik, O.N. ek, Norw. eg, Dan. jeg, O.H.G. = ih, Ger. ich, Goth. = ik), from PIE *ego(m) (cf. Skt. a= ham, Hitt. uk, L. ego, Gk. ego, Rus. ja).= Reduced to i by 1137 in norther= n England, it began to be capitalized c.1250 to mark it as a distinct word = and avoid misreading in handwritten manuscripts.
 
capital I? could it have a greater significance?
 
not= ?
not 3D"Look=20
negative particle, c.1250, unstressed variant of= noht, naht "in no way"= ; (see naught).
 
naught 3D"Look=20
O.E. nawiht<= /span> "nothing," lit "no whit," from na "no" (from PIE base *ne- "no, not;" see un= - (1)) + wiht "thing, creat= ure, being" (see wight).
 
wight= =3D"Look=20
O.E. wiht "living being, creature," from P.Gmc. *wekhtiz (cf. O.S. wiht= "thing, demon," Du. w= icht "a little child," O.H.G. wiht "thing, creature, demon," Ger. Wicht "creature, infant," O.N. = vettr "thing, creature,&quo= t; Swed. v=E4tte "spirit of= the earth, gnome," Goth. waihts "something"). The only apparent cognate outside Gmc. is O.C= .S. ve=9Ati "a thing."= Not related to the Isle of Wight, which is from L. Vectis (c.15= 0), originally Celtic, possibly meaning "place of the division."<= /dd>

 

why division?

 

 

divide (v.)= 3D"Look=20
c.1374, from L. d= ividere "to force apart, cleave, distribute," from dis- "apart" + -videre "to separate," from PIE= base *widh- "to separate,&= quot;

 

dis?

 

dis- 3D"Loo==20
prefix meaning 1. "lack of, not" (e.g.= di= shonest); 2. "do the opposite of" (e.g. = disa= llow); 3. "apart, away" (e.g. discard), from O.Fr. des-,<= /span> from L. dis- "apart,= " from PIE *dis- "apar= t, asunder" (cf. O.E. te-, = O.S. ti-, O.H.G. ze-, Ger. zer-). The PIE root is a secondary form of *dwis- and is thus related to L. bis "twice" (originally *dvis) and to duo. =

 =

is it similar to <= /em>

 =

de-?

 =

decide?

 =

decide 3D"Look=20
c.1380, from O.Fr. decider, from L. decidere= "to decide," lit. "to cut off," from de- "off" + c=E6dere "to cut" (see cement). Sense is of resolving difficulties "at a stroke." Origin= ally "to settle a dispute;" meaning "to make up one's mi= nd" is attested from 1830.

 

but if you just cut off, how do we settle a dispu= te?

 =

Next question is why b= oth the one dis- which means two

and the other whose on= e meaning is? negation de-

have negative mea= nings?

is it so in which case= s and if my first supposition stands is why?

 

Knowledge from the past and the transition of religions? 

The daimons became demons, with the Christian reign,
Science?
and after that came logos to illuminate the heathens bringing the logi= c attested of the Greeks? and science  

Which Greeks?, meaning of what form?

 the ones beleiving to the myths and gods? the desdemones which in rec= ent century onomatology means superstitious, and in ancient language , or t= he early scientists? that had not the ability to create the tech of today w= hich is the triumph of scientific validate and reality, science is reality = since it creates.

heathen?

heathen 3D"Look=20
O.E. h=E6=F0en "not Christian or Jewish," merged with O.N. hei=F0inn. Historically assumed to be from = Goth. hai=FEno "gentile, he= athen woman," used by Ulfilas in the first translation of the Bible in= to a Gmc. language (cf. Mark 7:26, for "Greek"); if so it could b= e a derivative of Goth. hai=FEi = "dwelling on the heath," but this sense is not recorded. It may h= ave been chosen on model of L. paganus<= /span> (see pagan), or for resemblance to Gk. ethne (see gentile), or= may in fact be a borrowing of that word, perhaps via Armenian hethanos. Like other words for exclusively = Christian ideas (e.g. church) it= would have come first into Gothic, then spread to other Gmc. languages.
 

desidemonas?

 

supe= rstitious 3D"Look=20
c.1386, from O.Fr. superstitieux, from L. superst= itiosus, from superstitionem (nom. superstitio) &quo= t;prophecy, soothsaying, excessive fear of the gods," perhaps original= ly "state of religious exaltation," related to superstes (gen. sup= erstitis) "standing over or above," also "standi= ng by, surviving," from superstare= "stand on or over, survive," from super "above" (see super-)= + stare "to stand," f= rom PIE base *sta- "to stan= d" (see stet). There are many theories for the L. sen= se development, but none has yet triumphed. = Superstition is attested from 1402. In Eng., originally especia= lly of religion; sense of "unreasonable notion" is from 1794.

 

science?

science =20
c.1300, "knowledge (of something) acquired by study," also &q= uot;a particular branch of knowledge," from O.Fr. science, from L. scie= ntia "knowledge," from sciens (gen. scientis), prp. of scire "to know= ," probably originally "to separate one thing from another, to di= stinguish," related to scindere "to cut, divide," from PIE base <= em>*skei- (cf. Gk. skhizein= "to split, rend, cleave," Goth. skaidan, O.E. sceadan= "to divide, separate;" see shed (v.)). M= odern sense of "non-arts studies" is attested from 1678. The dist= inction is commonly understood as between theoretical truth (Gk. episteme) and methods for effecting practi= cal results (tekhne), but science sometimes is used for practica= l applications and art for appli= cations of skill. Main modern (restricted) sense of "body of regular o= r methodical observations or propositions ... concerning any subjec= t or speculation" is attested from 1725; in 17c.-18c. this concept com= monly was called philosophy. To blind (someone) with science "confuse by the use of big words or complex explanations" i= s attested from 1937, originally noted as a phrase from Australia and New Z= ealand.=20
 =20
 =20
physics 3D"Look=20
1589, "natural science," from physic (q.v.) in sense of "natural = science." Specific sense of "science treating of properties of ma= tter and energy" is from 1715. Physicis= t coined 1840 by Eng. philosopher William Whewell (1794-1866) t= o denote a "cultivator of physics" as opposed to a physician.=20
pseudo-science 3D"Look=20
"a pretended or mistaken science," 1844, from pseudo- (q.v.) + science.=20
physiol= ogy 3D"Look=20
1564, "study and description of natural obj= ects," from L. physiologia = "natural science, study of nature," from Gk. physiologia "natural science," from physio-, comb. form of physis "nature" (see physic) + logia "study.&= quot; Meaning "science of the normal function of living things" i= s attested from 1615.=20
physic 3D"Look=20
1297, "art of healing, medical science," also "natural s= cience" (c.1300), from O.Fr. fisike "natural science, art of healing" (12c.), from L. physica (fem. sing.) "study of na= ture," from Gk. physike episteme "knowledge of nature," from fem. of physikos "pertaining to nature," from physis "nature," from phyein "to bring forth, produce, m= ake to grow" (cf. phyton &q= uot;growth, plant," phyle &= quot;tribe, race," phyma &q= uot;a growth, tumor") from PIE base *bh= eu- "to be exist, grow" (cf. O.E. beon "to be," see be). Esp= ecially in Gk. ta physika, lit. = "the natural things," name of Aristotle's treatise on nature.= The verb meaning "to dose with medicine" is attested from 1377. =

 

As Pauli had once stated

"Division and reduction of symmetry, this then is the kernel of the br= ute! The former is the ancient attribute of the devil"

so is science an improvement? in the gnosis, or istamai stasis or something= else?

astronomy or astrology? 

astronom= y 3D"Look=20
1205, from O.Fr. = astronomie, from L. astronomia,<= /em> from Gk. astronomia,= from astron "star" (f= rom PIE base *ster- "star&q= uot;) + nomos "arranging, r= egulating," related to nemein "to deal out" (see numismatics). Used = earlier than astrology and originally including it. <= span class=3D"EC_foreign">Astronomical is 1556 as "con= cerning astronomy;" as "concerning very large figures" it da= tes from 1899. Astrophysics firs= t recorded 1869.
astrolog= y 3D"Look=20
c.1375, from L. a= strologia "astronomy," from Gk. astrologia "telling of the stars," from astron "star" + -logia "treating of," comb. for= m of logon "one who speaks = (in a certain manner)." Originally identical with astronomy, it had also a special sense of "prac= tical astronomy, astronomy applied to prediction of events." This was = divided into natural astrology &= quot;the calculation and foretelling of natural phenomenon" (tides, ec= lipses, etc.), and judicial astrology "the art of judging occult influences of stars on human affairs&= quot; (also known as stromancy, = 1652). Differentiation began late 1400s and by 17c. this word was limited t= o "reading influences of the stars and their effects on human destiny.= "

 

chemistry or alchemy?

chemistr= y 3D"Look=20
1605 (see chemical), origin= ally "alchemy;" the meaning "natural physical process" = is 1646, and the scientific study not so called until 1788. The figurative = sense of "instinctual attraction or affinity" is older, c.1600, f= rom the alchemical sense.=20
alchemy =20
1362, from O.Fr. alkemie, fr= om M.L. alkimia, from Arabic al-kimiya, from Gk. khemeioa (found c.300 C.E. in a decree of Diocl= etian against "the old writings of the Egyptians"), all meaning &= quot;alchemy." Perhaps from an old name for Egypt (Khemia, lit. "land of black earth," found= in Plutarch), or from Gk. khymatos "that which is poured out," from <= em>khein "to pour," related to khymos "juice, sap." The word seems to have = elements of both origins.=20
"Mahn ... concludes, after an elaborate investigation, tha= t Gr. khymeia was probably the o= riginal, being first applied to pharmaceutical chemistry, which was chiefly= concerned with juices or infusions of plants; that the pursuits of the Ale= xandrian alchemists were a subsequent development of chemical study, and th= at the notoriety of these may have caused the name of the art to be popular= ly associated with the ancient name of Egypt." [OED]
The al- is the Arabic definite a= rticle, "the." The art and the name adopted by the Arabs from Ale= xandrians and thence returned to Europe via Spain. Alchemy was the "ch= emistry" of the Middle Ages and early modern times, since c.1600 appli= ed distinctively to the pursuit of the transmutation of baser metals into g= old, which, along with the search for the universal solvent and the panacea= , were the chief occupations of early chemistry.
 

As they say or see nowdays with words...

Greeks had no devils, so I guess one should start understanding what his la= nguage means before it is forgotten completly? why

why 3D"Look=20
O.E. hwi, instrumental case (showing for what purpose or by what means) of hw=E6t (see what), f= rom P.Gmc. *khwi (cf. O.S. hwi, O.N. = hvi), from PIE *qwei, locative of *qwo- "wh= o" (cf. Gk. pei "where= "). As an interjection of surprise or to call attention to a statement= , recorded from 1519.

 

  

Today I was gathering some work to send it regarding synchronous events, an= d at  the same time a song played which I found of my liking,then anot= her and other,  if everything binds so do the songs and the meanings t= o the ones who hear them, they are represanttions of ourselves and what we = are?

That from the external reality we create the reality that is a coh= erence of our condition to the outside, that this outside is not known, but= it forms according to our conditions

As they say the synchronous manifests in chain of events that link without = cause or effect?,

 could there be cause and effect? or are events more like syncronous a= nd because we can not perceive them create the language? or how we perceive= ? is the language part of that?
Or  ? either? other?

I will paste only song one part of the synchronous? the post is long enough= t,
F.E.A.R Lyrics

For each a road For everyman a religion Find everybod= y and rue
F*** everything and rumble
Forget everything and rememberFor everything a reason
Forgive everybody and remember

For each= a road
For everyman a religion
Face everybody and rue
F*** everything and ru= mble
Forget everything and remember
For everything a reason

F.= E.A.R

Finding eternity
arouses reactions
Freeing excellence affects reality
Fallen empires are ruling
Find earth and reap

= Fantastic expectations
Amazing revelations
Final execution and resurr= ection
Free expression as revolution
Finding everything and realizing=
You got the fear
F.E.A.R. (You got the fear)

(Fantastic expectati= ons
Amazing revelations
Finding everyone and reuniting
For everyth= ing a reason)

F.E.A.R. (You got the fear)
You got the fear
 

But the lyrics seem more than I ching than lyrics,  i ching is of cour= se or on course nonsense?

fear (n.) =3D"Look=20
O.E. f=E6r "danger, pe= ril," from P.Gmc. *f=E6ra (= cf. O.S. far "ambush,"= O.N. far "harm, distress, = deception," Ger. Gefahr &qu= ot;danger"), from PIE base *per- "to try, risk, come over, go through" (perhaps connected wi= th Gk. peira "trial, attemp= t, experience," L. periculum "trial, risk, danger"). Sense of "uneasiness caused by pos= sible danger" developed c.1175.

Filika,

Thanasis

Ps : Not to be minterpreted, I have only hints and not knowledge, I gi= ve only a view, and not a belief, though at some times it looks like and be= comes at some point, the following days it evaporates, difficult to be= clear, it takes years, of the juman an dis every day with effort.  

knowledge where? 

form morphy, scheme

scheme (n.)= 3D"Look=20
1553, "figure of speech," from M.L. schema "shape, figure, form, = figure of speech," from Gk. skhema= (gen. skhematos) "f= igure, appearance, the nature of a thing," related to skhein "to get," and ekhein "to have," from PIE base *segh- "to hold, to hold in one= 9;s power, to have" (cf. Skt. sahate "he masters," sahah= "power, victory;" Avestan = hazah "power, victory;" Gk. ekhein "to have, hold;" Goth. sigis, O.H.G. sigu= , O.N. sigr, O.E. sige "victory").

 

 see?>=3D seem?>=3D scheme?>=3D sea= m?

why scheme?  from PIE base *segh- "to hold, to hold in one's power,= to have" (cf. Skt. sahate = "he masters," sahah &q= uot;power, victory;" Avestan hazah= "power, victory;"

why? this relation?

relation <= a class=3D"dictionary" title=3D"Look up relation at Dictionary.com" href=3D= "http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=3Drelation">3D"Look=20
1390, from Anglo-Fr. re= lacioun, O.Fr. relacion= (14c.), from L. relationem (nom. <= span class=3D"foreign">relatio) "a bringing back, rest= oring," from relatus (see relate= ). Meaning "person related by blood or marriage" first attested 1= 502. Relationship "sense of be= ing related" is from 1744; meaning "an affair, a romantic or sexu= al relationship" is attested from 1944.

 

And the truth? verify? very?

 Should we think of the mythis or the stars = or the epistime or the language, one of each, some of each, all or non= e?

Peira or speira?

=

------=_Part_10030_32850756.1217752447776--