----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2008 5:18 PM
Subject: non-natural philosophy
There is a description that consciousness is at rare events
consistent and axiomatic in its behavior and when it moves towards axiomatic
thesis of consistency it has terrible time doing it, (might it also
collapse?). So in that scale one might ask why. Why it remains vague. The
difficulty of memorization could? be an example- proof of this.
A
thing that changes continuously in a pattern has difficulty in changing its
pattern but the fact is why? why do we have such trouble changing ourselves,
which axiom is the axiom when axioms constantly change?
I am looking for its characteristics in order to define her.
(Characteristics I call a description beyond borders, of its phenotype,
without correlations.)
Can I ever express what I want to like the first
time-unless I memorize it, or it comes out of memory? If my ruminations are
free every description will be different and at rare times would they be of
the depth I desire in order thought is identical to expression, as to give me
a sense of fulfillment. And the question is why the different ruminations,
what this means for consciousness lying in certain margins of
meanings.
The consistency could lie in places where the theory of
the noose takes place, the base that negates itself, as is Godel theorem,
which disproves itself.
Now to dynamics themselves, I wonder what bifurcation is indeed. You see
now in my world there exist a variety of phenomena and events which are
expressed in a multi faceted way.
There is a hypothesis I have not checked
yet, and do not know if I will, that the Greek language and therefore mostly
the ancient Greek where it derives from, is an axiomatic language, and has a
similarity to logical structuring or is of stricly logical
structuring?.
Which means what in the multi faceted world were everything
is connected?
Math and Greek are of similar origin? of
ancient greek origin? And if it is ?
so?
What do math really create
with their sympolism?
Possible answers?
So does have to do with
Godel, dynamics with Godel?
math of Godel to math to dynamics to language
to Godel
We forgot something Greece.
We add that up.
Greece to
ancient
And this is dynamics?
"The pendulum of the mind
oscillates between sense and nonsense, not between right and
wrong"
Jung
math of Godel to
math to dynamics to language to Godel to Jung to math to
dynamics
Sense to math?
math to sense?
we go
again
math of Godel to math to dynamics to language to Godel to
Jung to math to dynamics
sense to math to Greece to ancient to math to
sense to Godel to Jung?
ancient goes to?
yes
history
history to ancient to math to history to ancient
math
of Godel to math to dynamics to language to Godel to Jung to math to
dynamics
sense to math to Greece to ancient to math to sense to Godel to
Jung to history to ancient to math to history to ancient to Godel to dynamics
to history to dynamics to ancient ....
Tired.
Does
anyone want to continue with other interractions, what is the number
called ? infinite, and it comes from?
God it sounds
all Greek to
me?.
If one does not
understand a person, one tends to regard him as a fool as one
said long ago.
But who cares about Jung, Jung thoughts were nonsense
he says that the greatest and most important problems of life
are all fundamentally insoluble. They can never be solved but only
outgrown.
?
Wonder what growth could
be...
Should I add a sense to growth to the calculation and
calculation to Godel to fundamentally
insoluble?.
Best,
Thanasis, unemployed
physicist, guess some kind of a fool, whatever a fool is,( guess my Greek
is better than my English)
Ps:Should I add that up to the
list? and that is which list?
and the purpose of the list to the ones
subscribing to dynamics to me to the ones who created it to me to
language to purpose to sense to Godel to logic to madness to sense to
language?
Sense is being...
wonder who said
that?
what sense and what
being?
Welcome to
Gestalt
